Learn More Take Action Join Us Donate to NCADP Now!
1705 DeSales Street, NW, Fifth Floor
Washington D.C., 20036
(202) 331-4090 - info@ncadp.org

N C A D P   M E N U
Home
In The News
NCADP Blogs
Facts & Figures
Video/Audio
State Affiliates
Links
Publications
NCADP Calendar
Affiliates Login
S I T E   S E A R C H


NCADP is grateful for the support of Working Assets/CREDO as a 2009 grant recipient. Click here to learn more about Working Assets/CREDO and become a customer. Help us become a 2010 grant recipient by nominating us here.

Richard Thornburg Jr., OK - April 18

Do Not Execute Richard Thornburg Jr!

Richard Thornburg Jr.

April 18, 2006

Oklahoma

Richard Alford Thornburg Jr. faces execution on April 18 for the murders of James Poteet, Terry Shepard, and Keith Smith.  In September of 1996 Thornburg and three accomplices drove to the Grady County home of Marvin Matheson and abducted him.  Next, they drove to Poteet’s home, where they held Poteet and three other men, Shepard, Smith, and Donnie Scott, at gunpoint.  Thornburg gave Matheson a gun and told him to shoot Poteet, or Matheson himself would be killed.  Matheson refused, at which point Thornburg shot Poteet in the side.  Thornburg then told Matheson to shoot Scott, again threatening to kill Matheson if he refused.  Matheson complied, shooting Scott in the chest.  Thornburg and his accomplices then shot Terry Shepard and Kevin Smith, before setting fire to the house.  Thornburg and his accomplices drove away with Matheson, while Scott, despite his gunshot wound, escaped the burning building and survived.

In his appeal to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Thornburg cited several errors in the way the trial was conducted.  In testimony, Matheson made reference to a polygraph interview he’d taken, a reference strictly forbidden in Oklahoma court proceedings.  Furthermore, there were instances of hearsay evidence being used, prejudicial and irrelevant victim photographs being introduced, allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, and other things forbidden in a fair trial.  However, because Thornburg’s attorney failed to object to any of this during the trial, the appellate court was all but powerless to grant relief on those grounds.  Thornburg also claimed that his trial counsel had been ineffective.  Considering his lawyer’s failure to object in the aforementioned situations, the appellate court agreed that Thornburg’s claim met the first of the two prongs for ineffective assistance of counsel: that his attorney’s performance was deficient.  However, the court did not find evidence for the second prong, that Thornburg was unfairly prejudiced by the deficient performance.  Bearing in mind the extreme incompetence of Thornburg’s attorney and the sheer number of errors to which he failed to object, it is not possible to say with certainty that Thornburg was not unfairly prejudiced.

Richard Thornburg did not receive a fair trial.  Each time that Thornburg’s lawyer failed to object to impermissible behavior he not only hurt Thornburg’s chances for a fair trial, but for an effective appeal as well.  We must not show approval of such a flawed and unjust trial by allowing this execution to go forward.

Please write to Gov. Brad Henry on behalf of Richard Thornburg!


February 09, 2010

Subject:








We will add your signature from the information you provide.
 



Copyrighted images marked with a red asterisk are used with permission by Scott Langley.
Click here to read our privacy policy.
All non-attributed and non-state affiliate content is © 2009, National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty