Protect and Restore the Bitterroot National Forest

Help Protect Old-Growth Forests on the Bitterroot National Forest in Montana!

On December 3, 2003 President Bush signed the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) into law. The first HFRA project in Montana is called the Middle East Fork Hazardous Fuel Reduction project, in the Bitterroot National Forest (BNF), along the East Fork of the Bitterroot River. According to BNF officials, the goal of this project is to protect the East Fork community near Sula wildfire and "restore" the forests within the East Fork area.

While forest protection groups support these goals the truth of the matter is that the BNF's preferred Alternative 2 would mix a small amount of bona-fide community protection work with industrial logging of 4,000 acres of unlogged, old-growth forests, home to elk, bighorn sheep, moose, bear, wolves, coyote, bull trout, cutthroat trout, goshawk, martin, pileated woodpecker and flammulated owl.

In response to the harmful parts of the Forest Service's proposal, local forest protection groups - together with foresters, firefighters, restoration practitioners, hunters and others - developed a superior community wildfire protection plan that truly protects and restores old-growth forests called the Community Protection and Local Economy Alternative (Alternative 3).

We need your help sending a clear message to the Forest Serive that industrial logging of old-growth forests on public lands is unacceptable.

>>Learn More

September 02, 2010

Subject:
MEF Comments - No to logging old growth, Yes to Alt. 3

Dear Bitterroot National Forest Officials,

I am writing to express my opposition the Bitterroot National Forest's preferred Alternative 2 in the Middle East Fork Hazardous Fuel Reduction project.  It's unacceptable to mix a small amount of bona-fide community protection work with industrial logging of unlogged, old-growth forests with trees up to four feet in diameter.

These forests are home to elk, bighorn sheep, moose, black bear, wolves, coyote, bull trout, cutthroat trout, goshawk, martin, pileated woodpecker and flammulated owls.

I am in favor of Alternative 3 for several reasons including the fact that it was developed by local forest protection groups, foresters, firefighters, restoration practitioners, hunters and others.

Alternative 3 provides superior wildfire protection to the East Fork community by comprehensively treating the Community Protection Zone (CPZ) within 1/4 mile of homes.

In addition, it treats another 1,000 acres through pre-commercial thinning in plantations and slashing small fuels around large, legacy trees.

Alternative 3 will protect old-growth forests and critical wildlife habitat from industrial logging and would reflect the common ground of a wide variety of stakeholders, rather than more polarization.

According to Bitterroot National Forest's draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), Alternative 2 would cost the U.S. Taxpayers $1 million more than Alternative 3.

The U.S. Forest Service is closing campgrounds around the country, and doesn't have money to maintain our public trails and recreational facilities.  Spending an additional $1 million subsidizing the logging industry to cut down old-growth forests doesn't make sense.

According to the DEIS, 8,500 acres, or 33%, of the project area has already been logged. An additional 4,000 acres of industrial logging up the East Fork will have many negative impacts, concerning many hunters and outdoor enthusiasts as well as scientists.

The Bitterroot National Forest's proposal has the potential to increase the spread of weeds and illegal ATV use, not to mention further degrade soils and harm water quality within the East Fork. In fact, according to the DEIS, 47% of the "treatment" units would take place in areas where soil damage is already above the Forest Service's own standard.

According to the DEIS, a majority of the logging units are located in important watersheds that are already in poor condition. More logging and log-truck traffic on roads along impaired streams, such as Guide, Tepee and Jennings Camp Creeks, will increase sedimentation, potentially harming bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your response.

We will add your signature from the information you provide.

First Name*

Last Name*

Email*

Street*

Street 2

City*

State/Province*

Zip/Postal Code*

Send an Email

Your signature will be added from the information you provide.

Salsa Labs | Ingredients for Organizing

Protect and Restore the Bitterroot National Forest

Help Protect Old-Growth Forests on the Bitterroot National Forest in Montana!

Contact Us

Salsa Labs

Salsa Commons

Tools

Solutions